Intelligent ghosts and questionable investigating

It’s seems pretty common place nowadays that every city larger than a town has a ‘paranormal investigator’ in it. These investigators by default and by the large part, are weekend ghost hunters looking to catch a phantom in the act, either visually or audibly. Again and again, many of these investigators go about their weekend hobby only to come up short with an inconclusive result. Surely, with so many paranormal events occurring one has to wonder. Are the ghosts actually outsmarting the investigators?
I for one, am skeptical of current ghost hunting methodology. When I was young and read books on ghosts and their accompanying investigations, the investigators actually do the one thing that is apparently lacking in the fast paced world of present day. They camped. That’s right, they camped out at the location of the haunting for as long as they possibly could in order to gain whatever evidence they could, experience what can be experienced, and generally go the full nine yards on the research. I seem to remember, though I may be mistaken, reading an investigation that lasted for a couple of months.
This style of research has been transcended by the weekend ghost hunter, the team that spends one to two nights for a grand total of eight to sixteen hours, walking around with digital recorders and EMF detectors like Egon Spangler from GhostBusters, hoping for an encounter, and in the end, lacking anything solid except for a lowly EVP. In a sad way, is this what paranormal research has come to? Hit or miss tactics? Now understandably, the investigators, I am sure, are employed individuals who have jobs, and families. They spend a precious night investigating, and hopefully come home to understanding loved one. Yet is this acceptable? How can really credible research be done without the time, energy, blood, sweat and tears invested to yield not just something, but a quantifiable amount of evidence?
Now let us get theoretical to a small degree. Lets say you are a ghost. You live in this nice little home you use to own, and one day these strange people move in and start living in -your- home. You really are having a difficult time communicating to this family but every here and there, you manage to freak one or two out and you really feel like you might be getting through to them. You visit them while they are sleeping, showering, eating, having sex (you voyeur). Then one day they start to tear the place up to remodel and this just sets you off the deep end and you start making things go boom just about whenever you want, not to mention, you can now show yourself to them for a quick second or two!
Now you’ve gone and done it. They called some people. You’ve seen the family so often in -your- house that you are use to them at this point. You know who to communicate to, and try to show yourself every here and there to them, and how to make things go boom when you can focus enough on it. But these ‘other’ people show up one night. This crew of people show up in -your- house with strange equipment, walking around with camera’s and other assorted devices, asking you to talk to them and play around with this green light on one of their devices.
You know what I would do? Nothing. That’s right. Nothing. They are in -my- house, they are annoying and unwanted, and frankly, I don’t know what they want, but I keep telling them to get out and frankly, I can care less to jump through their hoops. They are intruders. I’m just gonna watch these guys because I’m not sure I really want to interact with them, besides, what do half of those devices really do? I’m not going to find out the hard way. They seem to want to play games. They knock ’shave and a haircut’ on wooden trim. Sure, I will knock back ‘get lost’. Now they are running around like bewildered children. This is fun. I go stomp around in a part of the house they are not in, and here they come running like Pavlov’s dogs. Funny! But it also seems to keep them interested. I’ll stop keeping their attention. They stay for a small amount of time and then leave. Cool. Now I can get back to trying to communicate with this family that I have been around so much, I’m kinda getting attached to them.
So much for the flight of fancy, but the facts may be just that. Ghosts may not be so keen on newcomers and can care less to interact with them. You see it on most of the ghost shows, a highly active haunting goes dry when the GhostBusters show up. The affected residents claim up and down how active these ghosts are yet nothing happens. Unfortunately, if the investigators tried to negotiate with the homeowners on a term for the investigating instead of acting like they are going to be like the Orkin man, they might actually become accepted by the entity and communicated with.
Should ghost hunters change their style? It couldn’t hurt for starters. Investigators, I feel, are learning bad habits from their TV show counterparts. Investigators should rethink their methodology by logical thinking. If I wanted to catch a ghost on video, I’m not going to set up a video camera in the living room and hope it catches something in a eight hour span, I’ll negotiate with the residents to see if I can run that camera 24/7 for a week. We will drop by, change the tape/memory card, away we go. Evp’s? Ditto. If I want to experience the entity in question, I would ask to sleep over in the affected room or area. You have to maximize your opportunities in order to acquire evidence. Investigators currently are the on the forefront of paranormal research, by default. Hopefully, ghost hunters will start to realize that their current roles are nothing more than a stopgap in what should be a scientific process, and their efforts ultimately are field trials for future scientific research.
Written by Gary Popella - Gary@ghosttheory.com
Get GhostTheory updates faster! sign up to our RSS Feeds or
add us on Twitter



exellent Post Gary,,,
Should ghost hunters change their style? It couldn’t hurt for starters. Investigators, I feel, are learning bad habits from their TV show counterparts.
I couldnt of put it better myself
Very good post indeed. It does seem like most of the times independent investigators mimic yhe same methods over and over, producing the same results.
Like mentioned in the article, most high profile investigations required some time to properly investigate
Gary,
I would have to certainly agree. Our group, ghost hunting as it is so endearingly called is our second job. We all hold regular jobs which keeps a roof over our head, and food on our tables. Our group has been fortunate enough to be able to campout though only for a few days on a couple of occasions. One we had done for 4 nights, and remained around during the day as well and this was in my opinion still not enough time. I think you hit the point dead on, and something that might make up for camping out is repeat frequent visits. Also groups seem to always have large teams of people while maybe a better approach would be just one or two investigators at a time. Maybe we should rethink how to better accomplish the investigation instead of looking at it as an outing with all of our group. I would have to say that we are guilty of the latter our selves.
Great Articles as always, but this one really got my attention.
Thank you Gary, I’m going to see if I can apply this to our techniques.
Great to hear that Corey and thanks for the comments! Play around with the grouping size, flexability is the key. One person can’t accomplish what five people can do, but you don’t need ten people to do what can be done with five. Find your overall efficiency amount where you can be most effective.
Good call by the way on the frequent visits, for it makes up for when you cannot camp out.
I totally agree with this article. I have been a investigator on the side for years and I always tried to continuely return to a place as often as possible. With jobs and familys its not easy at all but you cant go anywhere for one night and expect to suddenly have activity and find all the answers. Sure you will get that one in a hundred shot but frankly the only way your going to find answers is by dedication. Its like going to a doctor and him looking at you for 30 seconds and asking you 2 questions. Your not going to find cancer that quick nor can you know that a place is having true activity. Another thing thats interesting is the places that they claim arent haunted even though they experienced strange activity but not “enough”. I think it takes about 5 all night investigations to really verify if a place is haunted or not. And even longer to start getting answers. i love that quip you made about us being the orkin man cause its so true. So many people now expect you to have the results overnight becuase thats what they see on TV. They are used to having a problem and then it just being fixed overnight. I hope that people start realizing Ghost investigations are like Psychology there is no quick fix it takes time lots of time to get to the root of the problem.
I’ve been thinking the same thing for years. People should investigate for weeks, or even months, if that’s what’s needed for any certain case. Harry Price did it that way at Borley Rectory. Of course, he was accused of faking some evidence, but most people who believed then in the possibility that ghosts may exist, and their modern counterparts, believe that a lot of the phenomena were genuine.