<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Donna Lacroix Talks: Secrets Behind Ghost Hunters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters</link>
	<description>Paranormal, Ghosts, Cryptids and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:48:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davina</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>Davina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>I enjoy the show, although I have to admit, boring as some people may have found it.  I thought better of it in the earlier seasons when they seemed more skeptical.

I think I would like it a lot better if they made it more scientific, but considering the other shows it is up against, at least they aren&#039;t as bad as Paranormal State, who really give paranormal investigators a bad name.

As for Donna, my dislike of her has only gone up since Ghost Hunters International. She and Barry feed off of each other, she&#039;s more hysterical than he is though.

But neither of them come across as professional.  Barry just seems like an attention seeker and as soon as he starts shouting about something it usually sets Donna off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy the show, although I have to admit, boring as some people may have found it.  I thought better of it in the earlier seasons when they seemed more skeptical.</p>
<p>I think I would like it a lot better if they made it more scientific, but considering the other shows it is up against, at least they aren&#8217;t as bad as Paranormal State, who really give paranormal investigators a bad name.</p>
<p>As for Donna, my dislike of her has only gone up since Ghost Hunters International. She and Barry feed off of each other, she&#8217;s more hysterical than he is though.</p>
<p>But neither of them come across as professional.  Barry just seems like an attention seeker and as soon as he starts shouting about something it usually sets Donna off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-6451</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-6451</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Angela, GH raised interest in the paranormal and brought a different style of investigating as seen by the TV industry. I used to watch the first few seasons of GH because of that style and the content until the Halloween debacle a couple of years ago permanently snuffed my interest in that show. They deserve credit for their part in the current paranormal craze that is occuring. I wish GH hadn&#039;t gone doucebag distributing the last couple of years and kept their focus, but money changed all that I&#039;m sure. But you are also correct Angela, since GH first came out, there really isn&#039;t any other shows that comes close to them, as most if not all are copies in one form or another. I just wish that National Geographics American Paranormal show focused on ghost investigations, for if they did, it would probably outdo GH.

Thanks for your comments Angela!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Angela, GH raised interest in the paranormal and brought a different style of investigating as seen by the TV industry. I used to watch the first few seasons of GH because of that style and the content until the Halloween debacle a couple of years ago permanently snuffed my interest in that show. They deserve credit for their part in the current paranormal craze that is occuring. I wish GH hadn&#8217;t gone doucebag distributing the last couple of years and kept their focus, but money changed all that I&#8217;m sure. But you are also correct Angela, since GH first came out, there really isn&#8217;t any other shows that comes close to them, as most if not all are copies in one form or another. I just wish that National Geographics American Paranormal show focused on ghost investigations, for if they did, it would probably outdo GH.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments Angela!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela D.</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>I have to say a little something in defense of GH/TAPS.  Of course I&#039;ll be accused of being a person that will defend them no matter what because I&#039;m a &quot;fan&quot; or whatever.  Actually, if you knew me, you&#039;d know that isn&#039;t true.  I am often disagreeing with them on their interpretation of things and the way they went about an investigation.  

What did we have on shows about the paranormal before GH?  Think about it.  Ghosthunting/Paranormal Investigating has existed long before GH was on the air or even before TAPS itself was formed.  What I saw on pretty much every show about the paranormal that included ghost hunters was a bunch of people that freaked out over every sound, believed everything they heard or saw (or thought they saw) was a ghost, made conclusions without a shred of evidence or evidence that was extremely shaky like orb pics, pics that were obviously smudges on mirrors/windows/TV&#039;s or the camera strap, hair, or a finger in front of the lense and presented their conclusions as facts and usually had some hokey &quot;psychic&quot; or medium with them and took everything he/she said as fact. 

Like it or not, GH came along and was a quite different show.  No mediums or psychics, they actually looked for non paranormal explanations for things the client or themselves had experienced, they actually threw out things like orb pics calling them what they likely were...dust, moisture, bugs.  They didn&#039;t go into a place assuming it was haunted and they actually...get this...TOLD PEOPLE that they hadn&#039;t found anything and they didn&#039;t think the place had any activity.  

They did things very close to the way I had always approached investigating supposed paranormal activity and had not heard of many other groups approaching it in such a manner.  

Yes, I have problems with the show as it is currently.  I liked the first couple of seasons much more.  I don&#039;t like the fact that they&#039;ve gotten away from investigating private homes and instead now seem to do mostly &quot;big name&quot; venues.  Sure, I liked them to do more well known places once in a while, but not all the time like they do now.  I have other issues with things on GH.  But I still have to say, after the absolute crap I described earlier that was pretty much all paranormal enthusiasts had before GH, GH was a breath of fresh air.  Whether they are still worthy of being on TV and the adoration they get is up for debate, but I just have to say that I disagree that they haven&#039;t done anything good for the field.  The one unfortunate thing I would say has come from GH is the now numerous copycat shows that are just painful to watch and which include a lot of the same old crappola of other shows featuring paranormal investigators pre-GH.  Even with the debatable issues with GH/TAPS now, I&#039;d still much rather watch GH than Paranormal State (big joke), Ghost Adventures (bigger joke), or any of the other ones that have cropped up hoping to ride GH&#039;s coat tails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say a little something in defense of GH/TAPS.  Of course I&#8217;ll be accused of being a person that will defend them no matter what because I&#8217;m a &#8220;fan&#8221; or whatever.  Actually, if you knew me, you&#8217;d know that isn&#8217;t true.  I am often disagreeing with them on their interpretation of things and the way they went about an investigation.  </p>
<p>What did we have on shows about the paranormal before GH?  Think about it.  Ghosthunting/Paranormal Investigating has existed long before GH was on the air or even before TAPS itself was formed.  What I saw on pretty much every show about the paranormal that included ghost hunters was a bunch of people that freaked out over every sound, believed everything they heard or saw (or thought they saw) was a ghost, made conclusions without a shred of evidence or evidence that was extremely shaky like orb pics, pics that were obviously smudges on mirrors/windows/TV&#8217;s or the camera strap, hair, or a finger in front of the lense and presented their conclusions as facts and usually had some hokey &#8220;psychic&#8221; or medium with them and took everything he/she said as fact. </p>
<p>Like it or not, GH came along and was a quite different show.  No mediums or psychics, they actually looked for non paranormal explanations for things the client or themselves had experienced, they actually threw out things like orb pics calling them what they likely were&#8230;dust, moisture, bugs.  They didn&#8217;t go into a place assuming it was haunted and they actually&#8230;get this&#8230;TOLD PEOPLE that they hadn&#8217;t found anything and they didn&#8217;t think the place had any activity.  </p>
<p>They did things very close to the way I had always approached investigating supposed paranormal activity and had not heard of many other groups approaching it in such a manner.  </p>
<p>Yes, I have problems with the show as it is currently.  I liked the first couple of seasons much more.  I don&#8217;t like the fact that they&#8217;ve gotten away from investigating private homes and instead now seem to do mostly &#8220;big name&#8221; venues.  Sure, I liked them to do more well known places once in a while, but not all the time like they do now.  I have other issues with things on GH.  But I still have to say, after the absolute crap I described earlier that was pretty much all paranormal enthusiasts had before GH, GH was a breath of fresh air.  Whether they are still worthy of being on TV and the adoration they get is up for debate, but I just have to say that I disagree that they haven&#8217;t done anything good for the field.  The one unfortunate thing I would say has come from GH is the now numerous copycat shows that are just painful to watch and which include a lot of the same old crappola of other shows featuring paranormal investigators pre-GH.  Even with the debatable issues with GH/TAPS now, I&#8217;d still much rather watch GH than Paranormal State (big joke), Ghost Adventures (bigger joke), or any of the other ones that have cropped up hoping to ride GH&#8217;s coat tails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAUNT JAUNTS &#187; Is This Why Donna LaCroix Was Mad at the Ghost Hunters?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-6139</link>
		<dc:creator>HAUNT JAUNTS &#187; Is This Why Donna LaCroix Was Mad at the Ghost Hunters?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-6139</guid>
		<description>[...] ATrueOriginall left a comment on one of my other posts with an interesting observation. It was in reference to a mention I made on  &#8220;Noteworthy Blogs: GhostTheory&#8221;. In that post I listed some specific GhostTheory articles which I felt made that a noteworthy blog, including &#8220;Donna Lacroix Talks: Secrets Behind Ghost Hunters.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ATrueOriginall left a comment on one of my other posts with an interesting observation. It was in reference to a mention I made on  &#8220;Noteworthy Blogs: GhostTheory&#8221;. In that post I listed some specific GhostTheory articles which I felt made that a noteworthy blog, including &#8220;Donna Lacroix Talks: Secrets Behind Ghost Hunters.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-5996</guid>
		<description>GH is purely entertainment and nothing more.  It is obvious that they stage the ghostly moments.  I watch it mainly to see what the cast of characters are up to, but do not believe the encounters with spirits at all.  I do spend time wondering how they made the encounter happen though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GH is purely entertainment and nothing more.  It is obvious that they stage the ghostly moments.  I watch it mainly to see what the cast of characters are up to, but do not believe the encounters with spirits at all.  I do spend time wondering how they made the encounter happen though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goturheadupdonna'sass?</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-5472</link>
		<dc:creator>goturheadupdonna'sass?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-5472</guid>
		<description>Ron, actually, I am surprised you even noticed the grammatical prowess of the previous entry with your head being so far up the &quot;disgruntled&quot; &quot;canned&quot; &quot;fired&quot; &quot;kicked to the curb&quot; Donna&#039;s ass. Oh, my apologies, she is a decent person just trying to show her flipflopping point of view...&quot;Shinanigans&quot; or was is &quot;I&#039;m not trying to discredit anyone at GH&quot; (eyelash batting inserted here) . I pointed the eyelash batting out to you Ron so you could see it, as you have your head up Donna&#039;s ass, are you a stalker fan of hers? ;-)

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, actually, I am surprised you even noticed the grammatical prowess of the previous entry with your head being so far up the &#8220;disgruntled&#8221; &#8220;canned&#8221; &#8220;fired&#8221; &#8220;kicked to the curb&#8221; Donna&#8217;s ass. Oh, my apologies, she is a decent person just trying to show her flipflopping point of view&#8230;&#8221;Shinanigans&#8221; or was is &#8220;I&#8217;m not trying to discredit anyone at GH&#8221; (eyelash batting inserted here) . I pointed the eyelash batting out to you Ron so you could see it, as you have your head up Donna&#8217;s ass, are you a stalker fan of hers? <img src='http://www.ghosttheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>V,

You&#039;re redundant and boring with your rhetoric. Donna is actually a very nice person and not hideous. I&#039;m thinking you&#039;re probably part of the crew! Wait, I retract that statement for your colloquialism demonstrates you may still be in grammar school!

She may be disgruntled; however, she has the courage to come forward. Her mistake ...she spoke with Divas and she did NOT follow through with her accusations. BUT, saying she is hideous proves only that you are an infantile and probably jealous of her success. 

Thanks,

Ron
www.scifake.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re redundant and boring with your rhetoric. Donna is actually a very nice person and not hideous. I&#8217;m thinking you&#8217;re probably part of the crew! Wait, I retract that statement for your colloquialism demonstrates you may still be in grammar school!</p>
<p>She may be disgruntled; however, she has the courage to come forward. Her mistake &#8230;she spoke with Divas and she did NOT follow through with her accusations. BUT, saying she is hideous proves only that you are an infantile and probably jealous of her success. </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Ron<br />
<a href="http://www.scifake.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scifake.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dori</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-4642</guid>
		<description>Disgruntled ex employee or not, she isn&#039;t really telling everyone anything that they didn&#039;t already know - although it is interesting to see someone connected to a show who is brave (or stupid, considering legal contractual issues) enough to speak out about the things all sensible viewers had already figured out.

All of these paranormal &quot;reality&quot; shows are stupid, mindless entertainment.  There would be a simple way to appease the critics and that would be to put a disclaimer on each and every episode that the events depicted are not necessarily based on actual paranormal events - since there is no proof anyplace that &quot;The Paranormal&quot; even exists.

These days, I&#039;d much rather watch a show on the Science Channel which might delve into the actual physiological and/or psychological traits of the human mind which might cause someone to see shadows, hear voices, think things are moving on their own accord, etc etc.

You know, Real Science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgruntled ex employee or not, she isn&#8217;t really telling everyone anything that they didn&#8217;t already know &#8211; although it is interesting to see someone connected to a show who is brave (or stupid, considering legal contractual issues) enough to speak out about the things all sensible viewers had already figured out.</p>
<p>All of these paranormal &#8220;reality&#8221; shows are stupid, mindless entertainment.  There would be a simple way to appease the critics and that would be to put a disclaimer on each and every episode that the events depicted are not necessarily based on actual paranormal events &#8211; since there is no proof anyplace that &#8220;The Paranormal&#8221; even exists.</p>
<p>These days, I&#8217;d much rather watch a show on the Science Channel which might delve into the actual physiological and/or psychological traits of the human mind which might cause someone to see shadows, hear voices, think things are moving on their own accord, etc etc.</p>
<p>You know, Real Science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-4641</guid>
		<description>Well she could have been credible, but approached it the wrong way, and flip-flopped on her comments. Just because she didn&#039;t say anything while being on GH/GHI doesn&#039;t mean anything, she probably had contractual obligations to uphold and you don&#039;t bite the hand that feeds you, even with little pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well she could have been credible, but approached it the wrong way, and flip-flopped on her comments. Just because she didn&#8217;t say anything while being on GH/GHI doesn&#8217;t mean anything, she probably had contractual obligations to uphold and you don&#8217;t bite the hand that feeds you, even with little pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2009/11/16/donna-lacroix-talks-secrets-behind-ghost-hunters/comment-page-1#comment-4629</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghosttheory.com/?p=4466#comment-4629</guid>
		<description>Donna was the worst on GH and was hideous on GHI.  She never seemed to have a clue and the way she speaks is SO annoying!! I am in no way defending GH or GHI but Donna is not a credible source. It&#039;s amazing that she had no problem with GH UNTIL AFTER they fired her!!!!  She is NOT credible.  I am in no way defending GH or GHI but Donna is not a credible source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna was the worst on GH and was hideous on GHI.  She never seemed to have a clue and the way she speaks is SO annoying!! I am in no way defending GH or GHI but Donna is not a credible source. It&#8217;s amazing that she had no problem with GH UNTIL AFTER they fired her!!!!  She is NOT credible.  I am in no way defending GH or GHI but Donna is not a credible source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
