Apart from this, i think the figure realy looks a lot more like a human in a black suit. Carefully walking around a bush and all..

What would I do when I saw/filmed it? I would walk up there (okay, probably after he has gone), and try to find more evidence. Why did this guy only just film 20 seconds and go about his day? It makes no sense and indeed is one of the red flags IMO.

People love to post and moan about how every video that gets posted is shaky and blurry and that discredits the whole thing, now there is a relatively stable video and you’re critiquing it because its not shaky enough? Where do we draw a line on this? If a video is ever to shaky or not shaky enough why even bother taking video anymore? Its to the point where I think people who do experience a sighting should just take in all the detail they can with their eyes and not even bother pulling out the camera anymore.

I definitely agree that the lack of zoom is a very weird thing to do, but maybe that’s why the video is so stable. Most low end camera’s and cellphones develop a lot more shakiness as more zoom is used.

Again I hope you don’t take this reply to your post personally I just saw your comment as an opportunity to make a generalization aimed towards a common response to these kinds of videos that get posted.