Headline »

Farsight…Farwrong

May 21, 2013 – 7:44 AM | 196 views

I love the opening statement on this video:
Back in 2008 some predictions were made by a team of the top, military trained “remote viewers” – each with over a decade of successful service.
The video goes …

Read the full story »
crypto

Cryptozoology, strange creatures

Paranormal

News, stories, articles about the paranormal

UFOs

Flying anomalies from around the world

Submitted Stories

Our reader’s true encounters

Interviews

GhostTheory interviews with leading researchers and high profile cases

Home » Follow up, Headline, Latest Evidence, Research & Science, Weird news

Apophalypse No

Submitted by on January 25, 2013 – 6:56 AMNo Comment | 250 views

I know you were all worried, having just narrowly avoided two recent apocalypses. Earlier this month (January 2013 for anyone reading this article late) I reported on an asteroid collision in This Article

Back in 2004 a Near Earth Asteroid named Apophis, for Apep the Egyptian god of darkness and chaos, was found to be on course for a pass between the Earth and the Moon in 2029. The effect of this pass, depending upon where its course might carry it, could have been a predicted catastrophic collision with the Earth in 2036 somewhere along this path:

Astrophysicists were waiting for Apophis to make an appearance this month to revise its course. Among the new information was the fact that Apophis was larger than previously calculated, which while that would make it potentially more dangerous also alters its orbit.

“Radar data we have collected over the past couple of weeks have completely excluded any chance of impact in 2036. Furthermore, we can now precisely predict its trajectory decades into the future,” Marina Brozovic of the Nasa’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory told the BBC Stargazing Live programme.

Provided it does not bump into anything else out there we have not seen yet. Until that happens,
There will be no Apophalypse.

[email protected]

Henry Paterson

Editor at GhostTheory
"One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything" William of Occam

Latest posts by Henry Paterson (see all)