Hollow Earth Theory

Posted by Henry Paterson | February 25, 2013 36

Despite there being absolutely no evidence to support the idea, there are still people who seem to believe the Earth is hollow. That this hollow Earth is the home variously of aliens, Lemurians, Atlantians, or the people of Shangri La.

Myriad photographs are offered as evidence.

Photos like this:

Which apparently would have us believe that Saudi Arabia does not exist, and is merely a fictitious land mass created as a government cover up to explain away the fact crude oil can easily be scooped out of the hollow earth with a bucket tied to a rope.

For the geographically challenged, this photo clearly shows the Mediterranean at the top, the Nile visible to the left and centrally the northern Red Sea with the Gulf of Suez and Gulf of Aqba framing the Sinai Peninsula.

Okay, most of the Hollow Earthers claim more “rationally” that the openings that reveal the Inner Earth are located at the poles. But those utterly fail to either take into account that there is no land mass beneath the North Pole, or explain why the ocean does not simply drain away into the hole? In one commentary on the subject it was proposed that because there are also oceans on the inside of the hole, that explains why the outside ocean stays in place. Sadly, gravity does not work that way, especially if, as they propose there is another sun roughly 800 miles in diameter at the center of the hollow space.

Yes, that sun would have gravity too, if it could actually exist. We have discovered extra solar planets, gas giants many times the size of Jupiter, our largest neighbor which is 317 times our mass. Those Jovian giants lack the mass to ignite into stars, yet a sun only a little more than half the size of Pluto has somehow ignited at the core of a hollow planet like the Earth, and its radiation somehow sustains life rather than frying it out of existence.

Then there is this singular piece of damning evidence from Nemesi.net

United States Patent 1096102:
“The Hollow Earth Theory”
On November 25, 1912 Marshall B. Gardner of Aurora, Kane County, Illinois, USA, submitted his discovery application to the United States Patent Office. 18 months later, on May 12,1914, this federal agency granted Mr. Gardner United States patent 1096102, the second most important scientific document ever issued. Its scientific significance is exceeded only by the mechanical flight discovery of Orville and Wilbur Wright in 1903. For reasons which even Mr. Gardner could not have fully anticipated in the early 1900s, and which are now abundantly clear, his discovery soon became the most highly classified military secret of all time.

Patent a Theory?
A theory is an idea, what is referred to as intellectual property, and yes, that can be patented.


Intellectual property (IP) is a legal concept which refers to creations of the mind for which exclusive rights are recognized. Under intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, literary, and artistic works; discoveries and inventions; and words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property rights include copyright, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights, trade dress, and in some jurisdictions trade secrets.

So the possession of a patent regarding the idea that the Earth is Hollow in no way reflects upon the possibility that the Earth is hollow, or that by processing an intellectual property patent to that effect any government is admitting that the Earth is hollow.

Even if it did mean exactly that, very little searching reveals the true content of US Patent, 1096102 as a description with accompanying diagrams of A Truly Hollow EARTH!

Yes, the kind that sits on your desk in a crescent shaped stand with a base.

[email protected]

The following two tabs change content below.

Henry Paterson

Editor at GhostTheory
I would like nothing more than the proof of various cryptids, alien civilizations, even alien visitors to be found. But that proof will come only through rigorous science and objective analysis, and by holding evidence to the highest standards of scrutiny. Born in south eastern Pennsylvania, i have found myself at one time or another living in Chicago, Cleveland, Raleigh-Durham, on the island of Kaua'i and finally landed on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State. I have turned my hand to various professions from early work in 3d graphics to historic building restoration, carpentry and log home building to working in a bronze art foundry on the WWII Veterans Memorial. Currently I am a writer, script writer and working for a non profit organization called Empowerment Through Connection which is involved in equine assisted therapy for veterans, at risk teens and women.

Latest posts by Henry Paterson (see all)

36 Responses

  • The Oshmar

    You forgot the Nazi’s Henry, apparently they located a hole to the hollow earth in the south pole and escaped WW2 and took Hitler with them.

  • That’s just ridiculous.
    Everyone knows the Nazis went to the moon. 

  • The Oshmar

    It’s funny that iron skies and the Nazi hollow earth have the same premise of them coming back.

  • Don’t forget the political rhetoric of every decade or so.

  • The Rev

    Electrostatics is indeed electromagnetism, although at a different resonance. The refraction rate is the key to this understanding as well as a revision of Maxwellian mechanics.. Gravity is rendered into a magnetic wave form through compression, and coupled through the inversion of this compression. Henry.
    Although you many attempt to disprove the inertial effect of centrifugal force and the squared component of this rotation as centripetal, outward pressure, then you can begin to understand the true polar dynamics of helical rotation and balance. If these masses all undergo the same inertial reactions, then the comparative densities and the comparative relationships of orbital interactions would be identical to Galileo, Hubble, and even Kepler, however the true dynamics of torsion reality I leave to Tesla, Moray, Maxwell and others, including Dr. Courtney Brown, currently doing scalar research at Emory. He is one of the most advanced mathematical minds on the planet. He seems to have the same sense of scalar interactions as I do.
    Perhaps a little investigation is in order, including the work done by Dr. Paul LaViolette, PhD, who also summarizes these reactions in the exact same explicit terminology as I do.
    Gravity is magnetic. It is a reaction to magnetic displacement re=phasing from six polar perspectives.
    I have personally compressed, and inverted this function to sustain an increase in mechanical, and electromotive function.
    I am currently working on 20 variations of inducing this reaction and I am in contact with Kevin Steele at the Vancouver patent office, regarding these ideas.
    The prototype induced a reaction greater than a COP of 50:1.
    It should help us too speed up the movement away from fossil fuels, by inducing the same polar reaction as siphoning water.
    This is the same function, except water is not necessary as the conduit. I have developed a much simpler method that can be used anywhere.

  • The Rev

    Here is Saturn.

  • The Rev

    Mars on Dec. 5, 2013, as comet ISON debris interacts with the planet’s rotational electromagnetic field. Note the gaping cavern at the pole.

  • The Rev

    Perhaps this is the pole shot that was mentioned by others? Or this one done by Chicago University? Orr maybe this one, showing atmosphere on Mars? Look at the Sun…gaping holes in each pole, a reaction due to toroidal induction, via cavitation, an inertial response. I laughed at the one in Saudi Arabia, until I put the depth finder on it. It went to -900m under sealevel, the same as at the North pole, and funny…Antarctica, at the hole area, which should be above sea level by at least a kilometer or two, was set at zero meters. Very odd. Definitely not accurate. The next ones are of Ceres, also with a polar cavity, and an inductive plasma reaction at the core, causal to cavitation and induction. Then there is the MIR video. There are many more captures available.

    More than this, there is the reactions shown by all known physics, causal to rotation. There is the video done on the ISS, showing cavitation, over time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeMzOhoJpfw

    So there is plenty of evidence.
    The finniest part to me, is all these physicists pretending they know better.
    Tesla attempted to explain this to people over a century ago.
    I have proven much of what Tesla attempted to explain over 100 years ago. This is profoundly simplistic as it simply allows for Maxwells Aether to have the same inductive qualities as water, simply at a different density. The vacuum potential necessary to induce the causal vacuum interaction, is what is currently referred to as the back emf reaction, however this reaction is not equal to the electromagnetic reaction. It is the squared component of the electrical reaction, therefor has the potential to feed the vacuum response of its own inductive reaction, exactly the same way as water inducing its own vacuum, as a siphon, in perpetuity.
    By the way, nothing lasts forever, not even our own ignorance, so let us put the term “perpetual” right beside “impossible” as neither ever existed outside of the imagination of Humankind.
    Dr. Paul LaViolette, Dr. Courtney Brown, Dr. R.R. Searl, Dr. Tesla, Dr. Moray, and many others need review by those attempting to disprove quatized repeatable observable reactions.
    Even a basic joule thief circuit, a Cooke Coil, a SSG circuit and a bifilar coil prove the reality of this basic function of electromagnetic inductive reactions.
    It gets more complicated involving James Caldwell, and others under security classifications, like Hutchison and Searl.
    There is also this accidentally released photo from NASA. This was released under a miniature image showing the armature of the ISS. After the image was declassified and released as a full image, it was discovered that it actually showed more of the Earth in the background, than was originally observed as a smaller image. There is also the image of Antarctica. There is also the irregularities in the depth of both positions on Google Earth, as well as the obvious distortion at both the North Pole, and in Antarctica, easily visible on Google Earth.
    Of course, there is an absolutely massive amount of classified data, and also flight restrictions, and satellite flight paths avoiding these regions. There are also military perimeters around both holes and an enormous military presence in Saudi Arabia.

  • The Rev

    Gravity is one pole of a magnetic wave. We can only interact with one polar perspective in the same way that we can only see refracted light. Non-refracted light is invisible. Non-refracted magnetism is gravity.
    It is unfortunate that people posting, attempting to disprove physical reactions, refute themselves by bringing up Newtonian theories, long disproved by Tesla, Poincare, Maxwell and Moray. Not to mention three or four hundred others. I have a list.
    The only valid law of thermoodynamics is the Zeroth Law. All others are redundant. This has been proven factually.
    Rediscover the facts about induction principles and magnetic coupling, from the beginning.
    Ignore Heaviside’s renditions, as they ignore the back emf wave completely, fully two thirds of the reaction.
    Toroidal transformers allow this magnetic discharge to be refracted and recollected and reused indefinitely.
    Research BiFilar coils and Joule Thief Circuits.
    Let me ask you…all of you….if energy cannot be created or destroyed, what the hell are we even talking about?
    Class dismissed.

  • Ghoulface27

    No dude, is not a sun inside its a crystal burning hot enough to appear red and recently proven by the Japanese govt. google that.. Gravity centers in the crust holding the oceans too dufus.. Why don’t you show the Apollo 16 pics of the hole?

  • Unfortunately gravity is not magnetism and does not work by attraction to a surface. Crystal or Sun, if it is as large as claimed it would still certainly have enough gravity to pull anything off the “inner surface” and don’t even start with any anti gravity noise, as if that were true then we would be pushed off the outer surface as per Newton’s laws.

    And if this is the sort of photo you are referring to, it shows, at best a weather pattern, and at worst someone’s photo retouching skills. There is not enough detail to even determine that the image is of one of Earth’s poles.

  • The Rev

    It is unfortunate Henry, that you would impose Newtonian Dynamics for the observed reactions in electromagnetic fields. Newton sure as hell had no understanding whatsoever of induction principles, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, inertia, spinor fields, tensor torsion waves, and much much more.

    In fact, much of what is done today is directly opposed to these flawed theories, including heavier than air flight, and moving faster than sound.

    It is very sad however, the amount of flawed understanding that has grown from these erroneous predictions, even centuries after they were disproved completely by Poincare, Whittaker, Tesla, Moray, Searl, Leedskalnin, Hutchison, Heinz, Milkovich. Hey, check these two guys out, more people you have more than likely never heard about…Richard and Carl.

    US Patent 7,033,406 25th April 2006 Inventors: Richard Weir and Carl Nelson


    Or perhaps this fellow, Juan.

    Juan Aguero’s Water-Fuel Engine

    Patent Application EP0405919 1st February 1991 Inventor: Juan C. Aguero


    There is so much more.

    We have all been deceived.

    Patrick Kelly, PJK Book chapter 15:

    “General Energy Concepts In the study of energy systems, there always appears three elementary concepts. These are:

    Potential Energy, Kinetic Energy, and Energy Dissipation.

    Corresponding to these concepts, there are three idealised, essentially pure physical counterparts called passive components. In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of Potential Energy is associated with a physical property called Elasticity or stiffness, and can be represented by a stretched spring. In electronic science, Potential energy is stored in a capacitor instead of a spring. This property is called Capacitance instead of Elasticity. In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of Kinetic Energy is associated with a physical property called Inertia or Mass, and can be represented by a mass or a flywheel in motion. In electronic science, Kinetic Energy is stored in an inductor (in a magnetic field) instead of a mass. This property is called Inductance instead of Inertia. In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of Energy Dissipation is associated with a physical property called Friction or Resistance, and can be represented by a dashpot or other device which converts energy into heat. In electronic science, Energy Dissipation is performed by an element called either a Resistor.
    In economics the equivalents of these three energy concepts are: Economic Capacitance – Capital (money, stock/inventory, investments in buildings and durables, etc.) Economic Conductance – Goods (production flow coefficients) Economic Inductance – Services (the influence of the industrial population on output) All of the mathematical theory developed in the study of one energy system (e.g., mechanics, electronics, etc.) can be immediately applied in the study of any other energy system (e.g., economics). Mr Rothschild’s Energy Discovery What Mr. Rothschild discovered was the basic principle of power, influence, and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is “when you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you.” Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had the required appearance of power that could be used to induce people (inductance, with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their real wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation). They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory notes. Mr. Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for, provided he had someone’s stock of gold to show his customers as a persuader. Mr. Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individual and to governments. These would create overconfidence. Then he would make money scarce, tighten control of the system, and collect the collateral through the obligation of contracts. The cycle was then repeated. These pressures could be used to ignite a war. Then he would control the availability of currency to determine who would win the war. Any government which agreed to give him control of its economic system got his support. Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to the enemy of the debtor. The profit derived from this economic methodology made Mr. Rothschild all the more able to expand his wealth. He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by government order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the production of goods and services.
    Apparent Capital as “Paper” Inductor In this structure, credit, presented as a pure element called “currency,” has the appearance of capital, but is in effect, negative capital. Hence, it has the appearance of service, but it is, in fact, indebtedness or debt. It is therefore an economic inductance instead of an economic capacitance, and if balanced in no other way, will be balanced by the negation of population (war, genocide). The total sum of goods and services represents real capital and it is called the Gross National Product, and currency may be printed up to this level and still represent economic capacitance; but currency printed beyond this level is subtractive, represents the introduction of economic inductance, and so becomes notes of indebtedness. War is therefore the balancing of the system by killing the true creditors (the public which has been taught to exchange true value for inflated currency) and falling back on whatever is left of the resources of nature and regeneration of those resources. Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency gave him the power to rearrange the economic structure to his own advantage, to shift economic inductance to those economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic instability and oscillation. The final key to economic control had to wait until there was sufficient data and high-speed computing equipment to keep close watch on the economic oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits – paper inductance/inflation. Breakthrough The aviation field provided the greatest evolution in economic engineering by way of the mathematical theory of shock testing. In this process, a projectile is fired from an airframe on the ground and the impulse of the recoil is monitored by vibration transducers connected to the airframe and wired to chart recorders. By studying the echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in the airframe, it is possible to discover critical vibrations in the structure of the airframe which either vibrations of the engine or aeolian vibrations of the wings, or a combination of the two, might reinforce resulting in a resonant self-destruction of the airframe in flight. From the standpoint of engineering, this means that the strengths and weaknesses of the structure of the airframe in terms of vibrational energy can be discovered and manipulated.

    Application in Economics To use this method of airframe shock testing in economic engineering, the prices of commodities are shocked, and the public consumer reaction is monitored. The resulting echoes of the economic shock are interpreted theoretically by computers and the psycho-economic structure of the economy is thus discovered. It is by this process that partial differential and difference matrices are discovered that define the family household and make possible its evaluation as an economic industry (dissipative consumer structure). Then the response of the household to future shocks can be predicted and manipulated, and society becomes a well-regulated animal with its reins under the control of a sophisticated computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system. Eventually every individual element of the structure comes under computer control through a knowledge of personal preferences, such knowledge guaranteed by computer association of consumer preferences (universal product code – the striped bar codes on packages) with identified consumers (initially identified through the use of a credit card and later through a permanent “tattooed” body number invisible under normal ambient illumination). The Economic Model The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-1952) was an extension of World War II Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of controlling an economy: at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It was felt that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly as easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and control the trajectory of a projectile. Such has proven to be the case. Moreover, the economy has been transformed into an accurately targeted guided missile. The immediate aim of the Harvard project was to discover the economic structure, what forces can change that structure, how the behaviour of the structure can be predicted, and how it can be manipulated. What was needed was a well-organised knowledge of the mathematical structures and interrelationships of investment, production, distribution, and consumption. Briefly, it was discovered that an economy obeyed the same laws as electricity and that all of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were, and are, kept as a closely guarded secret, for example, in an economic model, human life is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a switch connected to an active inductor is mathematically the same as starting a war. The greatest hurdle which theoretical economists faced was the accurate description of the household as an industry. This is a challenge because consumer purchases are a matter of choice which in turn is influenced by family income, purchase price, and other economic factors. This hurdle was cleared in an indirect and statistically approximate way by an application of shock testing to determine the current characteristics, called current technical coefficients, of a household industry. Finally, because problems in theoretical electronics can be translated very easily into problems of theoretical economics, and the solution translated back again, it follows that only a book of language translation and concept definition needed to be written for economics. The remainder could be got from standard works on mathematics and electronics. This makes the publication of books on advanced economics unnecessary, and greatly simplifies the silent war project security.

  • Tomes Vor

    I would’ve read all that (no really, I would have), but my credulity has been strained enough already.

  • Kevin Hay

    Unfortunately, few enough of us test the reactions for ourselves, and we are always seeming to be dragged backwards by those who fail to understand even the basics of force and pressure based on torsion dynamics, as gravity, by those unwilling, or unable to test or understand these very basic functions. Energy cannot come from nowhere, as there is no such thing as nowhere. Energy is everywhere. Those of us who understand this, use it. We have little time to waste explaining this to the rest of you, wanton chaps, stuck in thermodynamics. None of you have seemed to realize that Einsteins erroneous relative function, was always inertia. F=MV squared, is very, very basic, as is the understanding of polar magnetism as force. Tomes, is unakble to understand the vernacular necessary to move forward using torsion dynamics and this is normal. The people he learned from apparently have little understanding of our physical reality, and simply made up answers from books that they read, written by others, centuries ago. Guess what? They used candles to write, so how much did they know? More than most today it seems, as they follow, while few lead. The last 100 years has been electric, and ignored by the majority, foolishly.

  • Tomes Vor

    I’ll go with science on this. I see little reason to do else.

  • Kevin Hay

    Then, go plant yourself Tomes..really. Just go eat shit somewhere pal. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fdc306c16f2ca3e97d031b4b45dd625788d635dcfde68ae3a00d1b3f93dd7f8b.png . Leave others to use this as we are doing.
    Few can even test these functions let alone understand this, so do not waste the time of others that can do this easily, and show others how to do this, even children. I don’t know what your problem is…just stupid i guess? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/93c4ad03f92486ea84d59a8d58cada8cf051bd3278774082053daabef17b95a8.png
    This is so easy, kids can do this.

  • Tomes Vor

    Being rude won’t make your case on… whatever we discussed ten months ago.

  • Kevin Hay

    It is a good thing for me that I physically tapped our torsion function and electrified it then….that allows me to simply ignore your emotional quandary, yet again.
    It is a good thing for me, that I understand torsion induction. It is a good thing for me that I know that we are already moving and that we can induct this inertia easily.
    It is a good thing that I also know that we do not need to put energy into any moving system to gain movement.
    It is a good thing that I know how to do these “impossible things” instead of simply talking through my rectum, as you are doing here Tomes.
    I care not what you say, as you do nothing and your words are hollow, as is anything that spins, cavitation is a physical inertial fact of spacial reality. I have also build several systems that can harness this in the same method that water molecules can, through toroidal induction mechanics.
    Now, as you sit on your hands, still not testing this, I am being contacted by physicists and academics who are testing these functions and desire to learn a better method at not just understanding these functions, but communicating these to others correctly.
    I am working with medical professionals who can observe these inductive transfers in cellular functions.
    It is these people that deserve my time here, not an ignorant troglodyte like you Tomes, who cannot even enter into any serious discourse, as you lack the knowledge to test these functions yourself.
    And, instead of learning these, as I have clearly and simply demonstrated, you continue to be ignorant and belligerent to others who teach this and share this here.
    And you say I am rude?
    I can read the torsion function mathematically, so if you can’t hear this, read this, use this or understand this, just get the hell out of the way of those of us who can.
    People have died for this, and you talk about manners?
    You are obviously much denser of mind than I thought Tomes.
    You can’t even understand anything involving induction mechanics, toroidal interferometrics or torsion compression.
    So, quit wasting the time of those who can not only understand the terminology, but who can also induce these functions.

    Guess what spins the dynamo in a hydroelectric facility??
    What moves the water?
    Gravity does. .. and this is an electrostatic function.
    So now you just need to go down on that Trump fellow and bathe in the shite that you him and others are spewing online….stupid troglodytes Trump followers, Clinton supporters…you have no idea what is really happening do you? So…keep wasting peoples time, and drown in this…
    Being rude, shows you that I have no more patience left for you now, and no need of academic peer revue or any type of false scientific -paper academia,which ignores functions and clings to theories like religion… only solid minds that can test functions, instead of regurgitating false rhetoric spewed for centuries, easily disproved through toroidal induction and inertial compression of any mass in movement, even oscillatory.
    So…Thanks for nothing tomes…really.
    Next time, take a fucking look at who the hell it is you are talking to.
    Some of us can truly do these simple things that you think are still impossible.

  • The Oshmar

    You’re kidding right?

  • Tomes Vor

    ”Gravity centers in the crust”


  • Rmon

    Kepler comes to the rescue..
    These Kepler’s-laws are in line with observations of our earth-sun orbits (and moon). If the earth was hollow, the orbits would be very different. This has never been observed, so it is safe to say it is not hollow. :-) 

  • Unless of course the Earth were much denser than previously calculated.

  • Rmon

    That is possible. Very unlikely though. :-) 

  • The Rev

    “Yes, that sun would have gravity too, if it could actually exist. ”

    This would be not be a hydrogen fusion reactor, but a plasma sphere, held in position at the neutral location, the null gravity position of our resonant oscillator. This is not complicated.
    Unfortunately, too few understand the principles involved in oscillatory induction and plasma physics. I have induced plasma in a rotating field. I have personally tested LG’s first microwave plasma systems. These used a resonant field, through an oscillatory central induced plasma discharge. These systems produced over 235 000 lux, using 700 watts of power at 225 volts.
    So, no, this central “sun” is not a hydrogen fusion mass, and would not have an influence of gravity, because gravity is a magnetic wave, and this is converted into electromagnetism, through induction reactions.
    Physics needs to throw Einstein away, and relearn Maxwell, Tesla, Poincare and others, those that did the work and understood the results, not posers like Einstein and Edison.
    There needs to be a real understanding of gravity, inertia, tensors, spinors, scalar fields and magnetism, and also electromagnetism plasma, orgone energy and biokinetics. These are all the same fields at different frequencies of oscillatory inductive reactions.

  • ilea vazan

    Despite there being absolutely no evidence to support the idea, there are still people who seem to believe the Earth is SOLID !!!

  • Pastor Boll

    wait… the earth is solid? Then were are the dinosaurs coming from?

  • Tomes Vor

    The earth.


  • Timothy Bratton

    anything is always theory and called crazy until the masses see it as proven truth.. the u.s government doesnt think anyone is ready for the real truth for the scariness of us possibly knowing we have been lied too all through our history and the many numerous other things they also hide from us as well. but its ok keep thinking the world is flat…

  • Tomes Vor

    If the earth was hollow, we’d all weigh a lot less, that’s for sure.

  • Timothy Bratton

    UMM… actually i dont think so.. because of the perpetual mass below us on top of the major factor of this theory that says there is a sun inside the planet would mean that there is still an equal gravitational pull, please keep in mind im not being a troll nor an ignorant idiot in my responses and choosing to disprove your theory altogether nor am i going to call you names for your assumption but in what im seeing just from looking on google maps you cant even see the north or southern poles at all.. coincidence? i dont think it is… considering its supposed to show the whole earth… there are reasons why anything is done in certain ways and one should always look for more answers then the easiest ones 😉

  • Tomes Vor

    Our planet isn’t big enough to harbor a sun.

  • Timothy Bratton

    I think maybe your mind is creating a vision of a star the size of the one we see in our sky daily.. this would obviously not be the case if the hollow earth theory were true… but if there is a molten core like we are taught then what would disprove the fact of there being a sun inside of our planet the size of this supposed molten core? if it were true it would have the same effect as that molten core would…

  • Timothy Bratton

    btw folks this is how you have a debate.. not calling each other names and acting like ur in 2nd grade… for those on other posts that only troll is with whom this is pointed at

  • Tomes Vor

    It wouldn’t be big enough to ignite. Look up ”brown dwarfs”.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.