Based in Brooklyn, NY, I write about all things creepy and strange. My book based on the real haunting of Doris Bither (The Entity 1982 movie) will be released soon. Got a question? Drop me a line.


Higgs-bosonSo, I guess the buzz around the block is that “mainstream science” is confident that the Higgs Boson particle does actually exist. If you don’t know what a Higgs Boson is, let me summarize it the best way I can:

In quantum theory, the Higgs Boson (or ‘God Particle’) is one of the elementary particles that make up everything. And when I say everything, I mean the entire universe. The particle is said to be part of the fabric of time and matter. The mesh that keeps all atoms, elements, chemicals, objects, and conscious life from falling apart. It introduces drag to all particles except photons (light), which travels drag-free through the universe.

If that still makes no sense, then watch this video which does a far better job in explaining the Higgs Boson.

If we can turn to our imagination and abstract thinking for a minute we can build on the Higgs Boson model. For example: Science is saying that with this discovery, we can properly theorize that everything in the universe is connected, or at least resides in the same plane of existence. From a quantum perspective, human beings are connected to all living creatures in the universal sense. Just like my carbon atoms are surrounded by the same particles that surround Jupiter’s rocks.

In that sense, many have theorized that a collective consciousness could exist. All free thinking creatures on Earth should be able to tap into a sort of “feelings internet” and share their feelings universally.

Does that sound a bit too out there?

Not according to the Global Consciousness Project. Directed by Dr. Roger Nelson, the GCP is a scientific look into predicting the future through a global collection of thought.

The Global Consciousness Project (GCP) is an international effort involving researchers from several institutions and countries, designed to explore whether the construct of interconnected consciousness can be scientifically validated through objective measurement. The project builds on excellent experiments conducted over the past 35 years at a number of laboratories, demonstrating that human consciousness interacts with random event generators (REGs), apparently “causing” them to produce non-random patterns. A description of the technical implementation is given under procedures.

The experimental results clearly show that a broader examination of this phenomenon is warranted. In recent work, prior to the Global Consciousness Project, an array of REG devices in Europe and the US showed non-random activity during widely shared experiences of deeply engaging events. For example, the funeral ceremonies for Princess Diana, and the international Winter Olympics in Nagano, Japan, created shared emotions and a coherence of consciousness that appeared to be correlated with structure in the otherwise random data. In the fully developed project, a world-spanning array of labile REG detectors is connected to computers running software to collect data and send it to a central server via the Internet. This network is designed to document and display any subtle, but direct effects of our collective consciousness reacting to global events. The research hypothesis predicts the appearance of coherence and structure in the globally distributed data collected during major events that engage the world population. 

The following video by 5th Dimension taps into the world of Tele/Psychokinesis. Using examples like the GCP’s ‘Egg project’ and other historical cases, the program puts together a very concise argument for the existence of TK/PK.

  • Ettore Greco

    New and old Science

    In spite of two findings from Einstein and Planck, one to show the equation
    between atoms and energy and the other to discover the constant between waves’ frequencies and energy, traditional science has never closed the circle. Still today, science does not recognize the transformation from waves to atoms.

    A new and Progressive Science shows how Wavevolution, or the transformation
    from waves to atoms, is the connecting link that closes the circle of science
    to open our eyes toward new horizons never seen before.

    The bureaucracy of traditional science prevents the recognition of any event
    unless certain criteria are first met. The problem of this science is buried
    deep in the compilation of these “laws” or criteria like the
    “uncertainty principle” introduced by a few scientists in the name of all
    science and from their erroneous understanding of the relation between Space
    and Time. This antiquated system of rules also results in misleading theories.

    For example, Space is not “curved”.
    In Einstein’s paradigm, a stone that falls on the ground from the window of
    a moving train also marks one parabola in Space. Although, this path is only
    apparent since the Earth is also moving and the Time spent by the stone to
    reach the ground has also changed to some degree that imaginary vertical line.
    At the Time of the initial Movement when the stone falls from the window its
    potential trajectory is one perpendicular Space that is no longer the same as
    the stone continues to move until it hits the ground. If the scientist had
    known that the coordinates of Space in Time are unique and unrepeatable then
    all the rest would have also been “straight”. That perpendicular is
    straight but accounted as “curve” because of the limits imposed by the old
    science that makes it impossible to recognize the concept of simultaneity. In
    reference to each body at any moment in Time there are always only two
    coordinates in Space for one perpendicular.
    And with two coordinates there is no curve.
    One perpendicular is unrepeatable and never the same because while the
    measure of it is repeatable and any measurement can be applied for different
    segments instead one perpendicular marked in Time will never again have that
    same spatial positioning. The perpendicular changes in Time but Einstein
    believed that the concept of Space is independent from the concept of Time.

    Another example is in the special theory of relativity which denies all
    absolutes and meanings of truth. This is in regard to Einstein’s example of two
    beams of light hitting one same embankment of a railroad on two Points: Point A
    and Point B. In between the two there is also the middle point, Point M. If one
    train were to run over that track then on the train we would also have Point A1
    on the wagon of the train correspondent to above Point A and also one other
    corresponding Point B1right above Point B. We would also have on the train the
    corresponding Point M1 above Point M. Einstein’s theory is that as for Point M
    (not moving because on the embankment) those two beams are simultaneous and equidistant, instead, for the passenger sitting on M1 and moving towards Point B1 (and also toward Point B) the two beams are not simultaneous because the beam in Point B1 is being approached by the moving train, therefore closer to M1. In this example, while Einstein’s concept of Time is rigidly kept unchanged
    in regard to the embankment, instead, the concept of Space is extended also to
    the next moment in Time when the traveler will move even if in that precise
    instant the traveler has not moved yet. Since the concept of simultaneity had
    been put aside, Einstein considered Time to be the same while Space instead had changed.

    Also, this same scientist erroneously believed that all colors in the light
    spectrum travel at the same speed. Much confusion comes from these

    One new Progressive Science will have to become more relevant before
    Humankind could see the first light of a new dawn.

  • ghosttheory

    Ettore Greco,

    Thanks for the informative comment. I agree with your statement of ‘old’ and ‘new science’.

    Modern science teaches us the importance of Scientific Principle when formulating theories. If your theory does not fit the standard scientific model, then it’s discarded.

    Remote viewing is a prime example. Many are quick to dismiss it as pure mumbo-jumbo. But why did the CIA invest (and still does) so heavily in remote viewing?

    Wavevolution is something I’m not familiar with, but now that you brought it up, I have something to read this weekend.

    Thanks for the info.

  • BW

    “Remote viewing is a prime example. Many are quick to dismiss it as pure mumbo-jumbo. But why did the CIA invest (and still does) so heavily in remote viewing?”

    Great question. Why do police departments consult psychics about certain crimes ? Why did the U.S.M.C. demonstrate dowsing during the Vietnam War to discover enemy tunnels and the like ?

    The answer (apparently) is that while science as an institution considers the paranormal disreputable, the -authorities- are of a mind that they will use what seems to work, no matter how unorthodox. One finds this ironic considering how conservative the police and military tend to be.



  • IThinkso

    The Man Who Coined ‘The God Particle’ Explains: It Was A Joke!

  • In the past, when your theories could not be repeated, it meant that the theory was wrong. Now, it means that they have discovered something that no one can see or find.
    This is stupid. Its like 3-1 = 1 is correct because there is a 1 that is yet to be found. No, its just wrong.

  • And particle physicists and religious people hate it but the press won’t let it go.