Trailcam Bigfoot: Update
Trailcam Bigfoot photo – Sanger Paranormal SocietyWe recently posted about a Northern California team that say they have captured a photo of a possible Bigfoot in the area. The picture is above.
Last night, I received an email from Jeffrey Gonzalez, Founder of the Sanger Paranormal Society. In it, he states that the area has been visited by members of his team for some years now and that Bigfoot prints have been found there as well.
Here is a snippet of the email:
…We went through the cameras really quick. We did get 2 types of black bear and deer.
It wasn’t until 3 days later when David was going through the photo’s again is when he saw the object. We are going back to the same spot tomorrow, July 1 to take photo’s and video of that certain spot.
I am going to stand at the exact same spot and have a photo taken of me for a reference. We are also going to figure out how tall this thing was. If you look at the photo closely, I know it gets fuzzy when enlarged, you can see the arms go down to the knee’s. I have done research on standing bears but their arms don’t hang down that far. Also, take a good look at the face, it does not have a snout.
You can actually see the chin and nose. I know you probably think I am smoking something but were not. David Raygoza has been visiting this site for 6 years. He has a lot of foot prints but not the shot until now. When we get back, give us a couple of days to put our findings on the web site. We did leave 6 cameras up there again and that one camera is in the same spot. I don’t think I will be able to sleep tonight……….pretty exciting stuff..
Here is the original photo that was taken from the Trailcam:
If you check out the top left had corner, there seems to be a rather large brown silhouette. That is what the team says could be a possible Bigfoot.
I can’t wait for the comparison pictures they will do today. It seems like it could be a brown bear or just an old tree trunk. The new expedition will help shine some new light in this case.
I’ll keep you guys updated.
Written by Javier Ortega - javier@ghosttheory.com
Get GhostTheory updates faster! sign up to our RSS Feeds or
add us on Twitter
It’s cool they contacted you with their concerns Jav, but it still remains that the trailcam picture is not going to win anyone’s hearts or minds. The problem is that there is only one picture for starters (all you really need is one…a good one though). Next up, the picture currently is not discernable to be of any use. What good is it if you can’t beat the skeptics back with it?
On the backside of all of this Jav I have the most curious of questions. Aren’t these trailcams usually set up for motion detection? If so, that figure seems a hell of a ways away to set off a motion sensor. Most of the ones i have seen were on MonsterQuest, and those picture were usually short ranged. If they had them set up for timed shots, more power to them.
Gary,
I think I remember someone on a show saying that trailcams usually have anywhere from 10-100 ft range, if that is the case then maybe it was just enough to capture something.
I agree, the initial picture looks more like pareidolia in effect.
My initial reaction to the evidence was a non-impressed one, but you never know.
I’ll keep you posted.
-Javier
Yeah, just googled it. 100′ is the max range.
Looks like a brown bear to me. Sucks the quality is so bad.
Gentlemen, I would question the validity of this picture de to the degree at which the camera is pointing and the degree at which the subject is pictured. I hope I am wrong but I use trail cameras all the time ad mine never takes pictures unless a heat source or motion causes it to do so. I would suggest you invest in the best trail camera out there called RECONYX and buy the RC55. Do not buy the covert as the IR is still seen by animals in all models. I have posted a video of my trail camera in action on youtube as well as other have to for you to review. I would HIGHLY suggest buying one! Good luck with your monster quest!
The basic structure in the photo my first thought and gut reaction was bear. The arch of the bodily form and the head in proportion to the body area I would have to say it is a bear. Bear or Sasquatch there seems like there would have been footprints of the animal in that area and nothing was mentioned about footprints being found or if any were looked for. If I were investigating this just after the photo footprints, hair on branches in the area, etc. would be the first things I would have looked for. Keep in mind when I investigate anything I look to debunk and rely on scientific evidence to come to determinations. With only this photo I would be hard pressed to come to another determination.