Gable Film 2: No New Leads
So after all the ruckus and controversy that this new film dubbed “Gable Film 2″ has caused, there is still no clear answer as to its origins and contents.
Many readers have all voiced their opinions on the new film. The comments on the last few posts have all yielded much speculation and discussions (some nice, some not so nice); but the bottom line is that we are still in the dark about knowing who owns “GF2″ and what is the rest of the footage on that film.
Theories ranging from Gorilla attacks to hoax are being discussed. Some researchers focus on the film’s origin only. The original film (“Gable Case #MPO41177-1”) has brought upon some good questions. What does ‘MPO’ stand for? Police code? Michael Patterson (bear attack victim) ?
Could it be something entirely different? Like what reader “amb3rfaith” suggested:
So I’ve been trying to research “#MPO41177-1″ to figure out what “MP” means. I got nothing, then I realized that it says “MPO”!!(lol). I thought that the “o” was a zero..
Well by looking up the “MPO” I found something that it could stand for…MPO VIDEOTRONICS!!
MPO VIDEOTRONICS is a production film company that started in 1947 and then sold the film company 1974,, and just focused on making projectors.. Here’s a link to a brief history on MPO VIDEOTRONICS!!http://www.mpo-video.com/history.htm
Now I don’t know if this is what the “MPO” stood for. All I know is that both subjects the code # on the Gable film and MPO VIDEOTRONICS, both have something in common.. Which is film and film making..
Reader Zach Luebke has done an incredible job at hunting down important paperwork that could put this whole thing to rest. Unfortunately, so far the results he has do not conclude anything.
I myself have tried to contact various governmental departments in Michigan/Wisconsin to no avail. Even emails to the YouTube user who uploaded the “GF2″ footage have gone unanswered.
Some of us have not given up on the search to get to the bottom of this mystery.
I want to thank everyone for helping form this ad hoc investigation on the films. I will update GhostTheory as soon as valuable information is passed along to me by the researchers working on the case.
Written by Javier Ortega - javier@ghosttheory.com
Get GhostTheory updates faster! sign up to our RSS Feeds or
add us on Twitter
well tough sh*t for the paterson followers lol. That film was taken by people who where involved in film making to begin with, loses credibility just on that alone. And I know the MI DNR can be thick headed about things but it doesn’t show MI DNR at all in that second video as far as I can see. And taking in everything I’ve pulled out, all the clues that are around the films, it leans towards this footage being fake.Leans on it so far it actually fell over all ready.I haven’t found anything showing its cridble in the least, nothing at all.Its not cridble. I’ve tried finding things that are cridble. You should look at my site. My blog on there. And probably check into all the investigation I’ve shown so far. I know a lot of people believe in this film but believing is not normal! There is no easter bunny. There is only facts. Not Beliefs only Knowledge. And if anyone believing in this footage that tries to debate it with me is a lost soul. And a waste for me to talk to. Either you know its real, or you don’t know, or you know its fake. I’ve noticed there is a lot of people on here who just believe and will fight to the death on there belief…To me they look stupid fyi.
I just received word from Steve Cook regarding the lyrics to his song.
He claims that “All but one of the verses in the original song were based on actual events, however, some locations were adjusted… The only verse that is entirely fictional is the 1907 crazy old widow story.
“…The Bellaire verse was based on a rash of sighting reports…that occurred in Antrim County in the 60s and 70s.”
So it appears the original “hoax” song wasn’t entirely a hoax after all…
Yeah it was stated tho that it all was a hoax. The song adimitdly was all a hoax. But like you mention facts around this song do match up to some real events but the location differs in the lyrics. Like it appears there was an incident involving an unkown creature scratching up a house in 87. but the location doesnt match the song. In any case he did claim the whole song was just a hoax made up before. Yet this stuff shows indesripancies…