Despite that there is no scale given on this photo and not even any reference to show it is from Mars at all, and is quite obviously significantly zoomed in to the point that resolution suffers significantly, One man believes it still shows proof of life on the red planet.

He makes broad assumptions about what is “real” and what is “fake” in the images he presents without offering a single analysis.
Seemingly he has never heard that the sun casts a shadow.

Henry@GhostTheory.com

Follow us on FaceBook for updates and more.

The following two tabs change content below.

Henry Paterson

Editor at GhostTheory
I would like nothing more than the proof of various cryptids, alien civilizations, even alien visitors to be found. But that proof will come only through rigorous science and objective analysis, and by holding evidence to the highest standards of scrutiny. Born in south eastern Pennsylvania, i have found myself at one time or another living in Chicago, Cleveland, Raleigh-Durham, on the island of Kaua'i and finally landed on the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State. I have turned my hand to various professions from early work in 3d graphics to historic building restoration, carpentry and log home building to working in a bronze art foundry on the WWII Veterans Memorial. Currently I am a writer, script writer and working for a non profit organization called Empowerment Through Connection which is involved in equine assisted therapy for veterans, at risk teens and women.

Latest posts by Henry Paterson (see all)

  • The Oshmar

    I think it’s kinda funny, let’s say they were trying to hide something like life on mars, why would they take pictures of it and then blur it? Why wouldn’t they simply take a picture of something else and say it was a desolate mars picture?

  • Why bother making the picture available to anyone.

  • Killyoself Asap

    Nasa blurs stuff out all the time.That one picture of that huge sphere on the moon is just ridiculous.Anyone who uses photoshop can tell that was done on purpose with the blur tool.It’s almost insulting what Nasa continues to pull. Amateur astronomers accomplish more today, than Nasa has in decades.

  • Nevertheless, all you can say about a blur is that the blur is there. You cannot draw any conclusion about what has been blurred unless you are in possession of an unedited image.

  • Steve Jr

    or maybe, just maybe Henry is on NASA’s payroll and he one of “them”…. lol

  • I could use the gov’t benefits and 410k.
    Contact me at Henry@GhostTheory.com for recruitment.

    I am also open to being a MIB.

  • HaywoodZarathustra

    They may yet find some Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, though. LOL.

  • The Oshmar

    Again, why would they bother to take a picture of something that was there just to blur it, why not just make up a fake photo or take a fake photo and say that’s where they took it?

    Also I’m not caught up with the amateur astronomers mars rover program, I’d love you to fill me in on that.

  • Well of course you haven’t heard of it, they are covering it up.

    C’mon Osh.