It was the image of her crossing that dry riverbed that first grabbed my attention. I must have been but a mere 8 years of age. I used to sit quietly and page through my father’s old book on the subject of the world’s mysteries. A large brown book filled with interesting photos of “ghosts”, “sea monsters” and mysterious spots around the world. Spots like the infamous Bermuda triangle. But it was the image of her colossal self that transfixed me. Her stride as she moved with great efficiency through the rocks and boulders. The iconic look she flashed at the camera that captured the world’s attention and consequently propelled her into every conceivable outlet of pop culture.

But it wasn’t just that there existed this photo of what many believed to be a mythological creature. No, not at all. It was the expression of Patty’s face that told the story of that bright day in Bluff Creek. The expression on her face conveyed an emotion that I know all too well. It’s as if the blurry image of her face pantomimes embarrassment and fear. An expression that takes me back to early years as a klepto. Once the long arm of the law slams down on your shoulder, embarrassment turns into fear as the gravity of the situation becomes clear.

Three creatures from the same tree, but from opposite branches. Humans and Bigfoot. The tension must have been thicker than the heavy malodorous musk that permeated from the Bigfoot. Here, god’s own creatures, who have never encountered each other, became aware of each other’s existence as well as their own. Man! it must have been like the Twilight Zone. The men frightened at the sight of the behemoth creature and they also must have been embarrassed to have startled such a majestic creature in its domain. Patty must have been extremely embarrassed to have been caught in the open like that. As you see her swing into her stride, she keeps a close watch on the humans and makes a frightened exit into the woods as quickly as she can.

That was the moment in which I felt my heart race with excitement over the possibility of this creature’s existence. Bigfoot was real and this was proof. I was ready to leave behind what I believed to be an impossibility and explore new territories and chose a common ground between science and myth.

Breathe, breathe in the air.
Don’t be afraid to care.
Leave, don’t leave me.
Look around and choose your own ground
.

The Patterson/Gimlin footage is considered by many to be probably the best evidence of Bigfoot’s existence. No foot cast or other piece of film has stood up to the harshest of scrutinies as the Patterson/Gimlin film. Recently though, there has been some chatter about a new piece of evidence that could eclipse Patty.

I became aware through a press release that one of my contacts in the paranormal had stumbled upon an extraordinary discovery. A full impression of a Bigfoot’s face, complete with six inch long lips, wrinkles, eye sockets and the outline of oily pressed hair between face and glass. This print was found on the windows of Jeffrey Gonzalez’s truck. A lucky break for a Bigfoot investigator. Not much else is known about the discovery. All I can think of now were the words that I read in the press release: “most convincing evidence since the Patterson film of 1967“.

I emailed Jeffrey, who runs the Sanger Paranormal Society in order to try and get more information on the developing news. A few hours later I get a reply from Jeffrey which just said: “Javier, give me a call! I will tell you all about it!”

I initially called Jeffrey while I was on the Metro going home from work. He wasn’t in the position to talk so I had to return the phone call the next day. Although Jeffrey was at work when I called, he was happy to set some ten minutes aside and fill me in on what was going on. “It’s been crazy the last few days, but we’re all very excited” Jeffrey said.

He had posted an photograph that he took of the imprint using his iPhone. The photo was posted on Facebook first, but as soon as Jeffrey’s other colleagues saw the public’s reaction to the photo, they knew that what they were sitting on could be big. Real big. So they decided to pull the photograph from the site and instead reveal the whole print to the world. A press conference was called for June the twenty third at four in the evening at some hotel in Fresno.

Of course when I called Jeffrey my mind was racing with the sour memories of the “Georgia Bigfoot hoax” in which Tom Biscardi single handedly choked the life out of his career and credibility. Double murder. As always though, I gave Jeffrey the benefit of the doubt. I’ve put Jeffrey and Sanger Paranormal on blast before, but that was nothing personal. It was straight up fact checking. Sanger Paranormal has claimed before to be in possession of startling evidence involving Bigfoot, when all they had in the past were photos taken by a trail-cam which seemed to be heavily influenced by pareidolia. Let’s see what Mr. Gonzalez has up his sleeves.

Jeffrey, as well as other Bigfoot researchers (some from the BFRO) were penetrating deep into the Fresno wilderness the weekend of Memorial day. Their mission was to find Bigfoot. Through trenches and mud, the team trekked through the rough terrain. Assisted by four wheel drive capable vehicles. The terrain up there is so rough that the vehicles that were not equipped with four wheel drive were automatically stuck in the mud. Jeffrey’s F-150 truck was left behind. The trip itself was uneventful except for a few strange howls during the night. Something that the team was familiar with.

A day later and the weather clears up a bit. The mud in which Jeffrey’s truck had been stuck in was drying up a bit, but not quite enough for him to pull his truck out.

So we came back to my truck and it was stuck there. It was on a very remote location which was difficult to get to. I left everything in the truck and took off with the guys.

A few days later, Jeffery wanted to retrieve his laptop from the truck so he called his friend to give him a lift up to the location. Upon coming up to where they last left Jeffery’s truck, they both noticed a pair of tree branches criss-crossed in the middle of the road. These branches appeared to have been left by someone who did not want anybody to come up the trail. They both though it strange that someone would do this, especially in such a secluded area. Once the branches were removed and the area combed for footprint or tire track, of which none were found, they continued on the path. Suddenly another obstacle blocked their path. Another set of criss-crossed branches lay up the road in front of them. This time though, they were bigger.

No prints or tire tracks there either. Moving forward the ran into yet another set of road blockage, this time it took the men some time to remove the massive tree trunks that blocked the road. Yet no footprints were visible around the area. Upon coming up the road, the men spot the fourth and last obstruction in their path. This time the trees were tremendously heavy and there were prints found in the vicinity. Although it could be tricky at times to differentiate bear foot prints to those of humans, Jeffrey believes to be able to tell the difference. He’s seen bear tracks up in these remote parts of the woods before. The prints that were around his truck were different though. Bigger than any bear tracks that they have seen before.

What Jeffrey found next is the main reason for this article.

There, highly detailed and massively impressive, was the imprint of a large ape-like creature on the window of his F-150 truck.

“I felt like I was gonna throw up, Javier”

“…it shows the wrinkles and oily hair that was pressed up against the passenger window of my truck. What’s more impressive is that on the driver’s side, a much taller creature made even a more detailed imprint. Like it was looking inside the truck.”

I sat there listening to Jeffrey describe what he had in his possession. I know that it would be irresponsible of me to get prematurely excited about such a find. I’ve been let down countless times whenever someone claimed to have “knock-out evidence” concerning the paranormal. This time, I was cautious. I wanted to hear from Jeffrey’s own mouth what he had found. In his own mind, he knows that this is the real deal. In my mind, I tire of the same old story. I felt like I was about to embark in another writing assignment which would only end in a dreadful manner. This is the Sisyphean task of a paranormal journalist I guess. Although I’m in it for my own curiosity, I have to admit that most of the time I feel as though I’m wasting my time chasing pipe dreams. Time is running out and I’m not closer to finding the answers I seek.

And you run and you run to catch up with the sun, but it’s sinking
And racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you’re older
And shorter of breath and one day closer to death

The world has been invited. The press is anxious and the stage is set. June 23rd, 2011. In a small hotel in Fresno, Jeffrey and the rest of the researchers will reveal to the world the prints. Hair samples that were left by the creature were collected by the team. Whether DNA analysis have been made or not is not known yet. DNA can be tricky though. Since we do not have a database of Bigfoot DNA, we don’t know what to look for.

Of course, all this hoopla doesn’t excite those who have been debunking hoaxes for a long time. Cryptomundo’s Loren Coleman had something to say about all this. In a Facebook post, Jeffrey announced the following shortly after gathering the evidence:

Well, someone leaked the photo…. This photo that was leaked was a snapshot taken of the video that I took with my i phone. This photo was placed on my wall for a couple of hours the day after we got back but then I removed it. Someone saved it then they released it today. Bummer, I’m pissed….but this photo is a sucky one. We still have the drivers side window to show everyone.

Jeffrey thought the evidence was monumental and wanted to share with the world what he had found. His friend, David Raygoza suggested that he take it down immediately and do a press release. After all, this was too good to be true according to them.

Loren Coleman then posted the following comment on Jeffrey’s Facebook:

You leaked the photo. If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. First off, Jeffrey and David, don’t complain to me about all the publicity, notice, and comments you are getting. You put out a press release. That means you wanted¬†publicity. You leaked, released, forgot you posted, and so forth your photo. Fair use and public domain come into play. After your press release, what, did you think people would sit on our hands and not investigate? Now you have national AOL News attention because I told them about your press release, and you are “pissed” at me? OMG. Get a grip. This is what you wanted and now you aren’t happy it is not developing in the fashion you scripted it in your head? This is media attention. You wanted media attention. You should be thanking me, not cursing me. Would you rather you were given the silent treatment? Gosh. You can’t put out something, not take responsibility for it, and then blame everyone else for reacting to it. Think about how you are reacting to this, and chill out.

Jeffrey and David weren’t too happy that a reader from Cryptomundo downloaded and saved a copy of the iPhone photo and shared it with Loren and Cryptomundo.

Now, I don’t want to get into what they all have going on. Bruised egos or bragging rights…I don’t know the story behind Cryptomundo, Loren, David and Jeffrey; and quite simply, I don’t care.

What I do care is finding out the truth. All drama and egos aside, what we have here are men who have claimed to be in possession of evidence that might shock science. Of course, if this all isn’t just an imprint of a bear.

That was what I initially believed this all to be. Just a nosey bear smearing it’s face on Jeffrey’s truck, possibly curious or looking for food. This is what I told Jeffrey. His response was quick and stern:

“Nope, I had an ice chest fool of food in the back of the truck. If this was a bear, it would have torn my tailgate off and torn the ice chest apart…”

Makes sense to me. I’ve seen the damage a hungry bear can do to a family van. Like scissors tearing through an empty Coke can. It still does not rule out a bear though.

So why are Bigfoot researchers and Cryptozoloogists in an online war with each other over new evidence? Like I said, it could be an ego thing, bragging rights or maybe monetary. Regardless, I do hold strong reservations and lean more towards the skeptical side on this story. The “Georgia Bigfoot hoax” really burned my expectations of Bigfoot researchers and those who are wannabes.

Money, get back
I’m all right Jack, keep your hands off of my stack
Money, it’s a hit
Don’t give me that do-goody-good bullshit

So I sit here enjoying the circus act. Pass the popcorn because it’s about to get serious in a minute.

GhostTheory readers are a clever bunch. We’re skeptical and remain observant. As the drama begins to unfold and come to a cusp on June 23rd, we’ll be making smug remarks and shaking our heads in a disapproval manner towards the way things unfolded.

Between us writers, readers and armchair skeptics, we’ve always had a battle of wits with field researchers. We comfortably sit on a desk and critique the research being done and how the evidence is treated. Which there is nothing wrong with doing, but researchers feel that we’re too skeptical and hard-headed at times. But in the end, regardless of impressive prints and flawless footage they present, there is nothing to 100% prove the existence of ghosts or Bigfoot. we go round and round and argue moot points. The skeptics Vs. The Field researchers.

As a writer for a popular website, I feel responsible for leading an intelligent and forward-thinking discussion panel. The GhostTheory thinking army can march in unison when called upon.

Us, and them
And after all were only ordinary men.
Me, and you.
God only knows it’s noz what we would choose to do.
Forward he cried from the rear
And the front rank died.
And the general sat and the lines on the map
Moved from side to side.
Black and blue
And who knows which is which and who is who.
Up and down.
But in the end it’s only round and round.
Haven’t you heard it’s a battle of words

So we all wait with anticipation and reservation. I remind you, as I reminded Jeffrey: This could potentially ruin Sanger’s and the rest of the Bigfoot researcher’s reputation. As far as mainstream science is concerned.

Can we say that there exists only a negative preconception of abstract science? Cryptozoology, paranormal and everything in between only gets the roll of the eye from mainstream science. Can you really blame them though? With all the drama that goes on behind the scenes and all the poor evidence that is presented and sometimes held as absolute proof by some.

We poke and prod on the dark side of science. In the end, we will know for sure what is in store for us come June 23rd.

All that is now, and
All that is gone, and
All that’s to come, and
Everything under the sun is in tune
But the sun is eclipsed by the moon

There is no dark side of the moon, really
Matter of fact it’s all dark

The following two tabs change content below.
Based in Brooklyn, NY, I write about all things creepy and strange. My book based on the real haunting of Doris Bither (The Entity 1982 movie) will be released soon. Got a question? Drop me a line.

Latest posts by Xavier Ortega (see all)

  • remixthis

    Great article! I look forward to whatever June 23rd brings…

  • John

    Fake

  • Ramon

    Why would an animal put his entire front surface to a glass window anyway? It just does not make any sense.
    I suspect these guys just made up another way of obtaining “evidence” without a lot of hassle. In other words, completely set-up..

  • Henry

    I would call it a Shroud of Turin before a Holy Grail.
    This is too indistinct.

  • whipthorn

    Where are the hand prints? I find it extremely hard to believe a crypto with hands would not put them on the vehicle to balance while looking inside.

  • Procyon

    Coleman and the regulars at Cryptomundo don’t believe anything is real unless THEY are the ones to find it or break the news. Coleman conveniently leaves out the fact nowadays that HE was also sucked in by the Georgia bigfoot hoax a couple years ago.

  • jamesrav

    are there plans to go back *immediately* and do a mini-expedition? Two Bigfoot outside of Fresno – how convenient is that? Why wouldn’t a hungry, intelligent animal take a tree trunk and smash the windows looking for food? I know I would. Had the truck been trashed, and the hair positively identified as *not* being a bear, I’d be more likely to believe the story. Left his laptop and perfectly good food, for two days? Can this find definitively ‘prove’ anything? No. Can it be ‘disproved’ conclusively as a hoax? No. So it’s another in the growing realm of “take from it what you want”, and will be forgotten in short order.

  • Gusto

    Unfortunately, even if the photos & video are real and not faked, this will not constitute proof. Only DNA will validate the claim that the “imprint” creator was not human. I can understand if DNA was left, however thorough DNA testing takes longer than these gents claim to have had prior to coming forward. And hairs? I simply cannot see how hairs would be recovered in this instance.

  • Retired BF Researcher

    Let’s look at this from another angle. Let’s say, for the sake of conversation, that the imprints on the truck’s glass are real, the facial imprints of at least one and perhaps two bigfoot peering into the truck.

    How in the world could they ever prove the reality of these? There is no bigfoot DNA to compare it with. The best they could hope for is “primate-type unknown.” One could speculate they even found hair samples attached to the truck. So what? There are probably miles of bigfoot hair that have been recovered and they’ve yet to prove anything. Hand prints and footprints with dermal ridges have also been recovered. None of these have led to mainstream zoology accepting bigfoot type creatures.

    I’ve no idea if these men are on the level or not. What I am saying is that if they have evidence of a genuine bigfoot, the burden of proof will still be on them, and they can expect no assistance from mainstream science. Even if forensic testing supports some or all of their arguments, there will be an endless line of “experts” queuing up five minutes after their press conference to debunk them.

    I came to the conclusion that even if a bigfoot researcher would lead a living specimen into a college medical facility by the hand that the story would be expertly debunked, the researcher ridiculed, and the story would quickly become fodder for late-night talk show comics and then forgotten within a fortnight. Do any of you truly understand the massive and staggeringly overwhelming evidence it would take to make anthropologists and zoologists rewrite every known textbook? I don’t see that happening within my lifetime, if ever.

  • RednGreen

    Retired, I could not agree more.

  • MostInterestingMan

    It appears the “chest” area in the photo is actually reflection in the glass of the photographer. I see the collar of a T-shirt and a jacket or sweatshirt w/hood over it. Enlarge the photo and you can clearly see the t-shirt and jacket outline. That is not part of the impression, it’s reflection. You can also see that the chest does not line up with the face and therefore must be ancillary to the impression image.

  • colekane

    so the 23rd has arrived lets see this bigfoot

  • I agree with Retired BF Researcher 100 percent.

    It’s scary to me that people who are requiring more proof than smudges on a windshield are being branded “skeptics” like it is a dirty word. If shows like “Ghost Hunters” and “Finding Bigfoot” have taught us anything, it is that we must remain vigilant and use discretion when presenting any “evidence.” We HAVE to remain skeptical until the evidence proves otherwise. This whole press conference thing has blown up into an embarrassing circus, and Mr. Gonzalez has made promises that he cannot keep. I think deep down, even his supporters know that by now. While I can understand people supporting Mr. Gonzalez because they know him, that doesn’t mean that what he found is proof. I don’t think he is lying or hoaxing this find. I simply believe he is rushing to judgment here, and that, ultimately, is what will sink him. Especially if, as was pointed out in this article, he has a history of jumping to conclusions and claiming to have amazing evidence that actually isn’t.

    In the end, smudges that look kinda sorta like Bigfoot and inconclusive DNA will just get added to the enormous heap of evidence already collected that is interesting yet inconclusive. Unless Mr. Gonzalez has a body or a living, breathing Bigfoot, he has a lot of explaining and apologizing to do, to all of us.

  • Messin’ with Sasquatch

    Why would you leave your laptop in your vehicle?

  • Mateo

    I am a believer in bigfoot, but I have questions about this, and other similar stories. It just seems really odd to me that the ones going out and trying to find bigfoot are always the ones that find stuff. I guess it can be argued that they are experienced and try to locate them using good investigative means, but it seems odd. Maybe I am turning into a skeptic?